<div class="gmail_quote">On 10 November 2011 09:13, Greg Ewing <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz">greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">This is patently untrue, because by version of the grammar</div>
allows 'f(yield from x)', while disallowing 'f(yield x)'.<br>
<br>
I made a conscious decision to do that, and I'm a bit alarmed<br>
at this decision being overridden at the last moment with no<br>
debate.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>We have precedent for being more restrictive initially, and relaxing those restrictions later.</div><div><br></div><div>I suggest that the more restrictive implementation go in now so that people can start playing with it. If the discussion comes to a consensus on more relaxed syntax, that can be added later (either in 3.3 or a later release).</div>
<div><br></div><div>Tim Delaney </div></div>