<p>I was under the impression this is already in 3.3?</p>
<p>On Nov 25, 2011 10:58 PM, "Eli Bendersky" <<a href="mailto:eliben@gmail.com">eliben@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
>> > However, the original question remains - on the 100MB file also, although<br>
>> > in 2.7 readinto is 35% faster than readandcopy(), on 3.2 it's about the<br>
>> > same speed (even a few % slower). That said, I now observe with Python 3.3<br>
>> > the same speed as with 2.7, including the readinto() speedup - so it<br>
>> > appears that the readinto() regression has been solved in 3.3? Any clue<br>
>> > about where it happened (i.e. which bug/changeset)?<br>
>><br>
>> It would probably be <a href="http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a1d77c6f4ec1/">http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a1d77c6f4ec1/</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> Great, thanks. This is an important change, definitely something to wait for in 3.3 <br>
> Eli<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Python-Dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Python-Dev@python.org">Python-Dev@python.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev">http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev</a><br>
> Unsubscribe: <a href="http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/anacrolix%40gmail.com">http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/anacrolix%40gmail.com</a><br>
><br>
</p>