<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><br></div><div><br>On Feb 27, 2013, at 3:20 PM, anatoly techtonik <<a href="mailto:techtonik@gmail.com">techtonik@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div style="">
<div style=""><br></div><div style=""><div>* security by obscurity in legal position of PSF towards contributors</div><div> <a href="https://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html">https://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html</a></div>
<div style=""> vs</div><div style=""> <a href="http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/">http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/</a> + <a href="http://www.samurajdata.se/opensource/mirror/licenses/afl-2.1.php">http://www.samurajdata.se/opensource/mirror/licenses/afl-2.1.php</a></div>
<div style=""> or </div><div style=""><div> <a href="http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/">http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/</a> + <a href="http://opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php">http://opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php</a></div>
<div> and why PSF doesn't comply the 4. Redistribution clause from Apache 2.0 license<br></div></div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><br><div>I'm not even touching your security through obscurity trollbait, but I'd like to know how the PSF / Python core is non compliant with clause 4, and the legal counsel you spoke to to confirm this.</div><div><br></div><div>Jesse</div></body></html>