<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/14/2014 10:11 AM, Jim J. Jewett
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:52d57def.0180310a.4b08.ffffa287@mx.google.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Virtual subclass ASCIIStructuredBytes</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
You would first have to define what you meant by a virtual subclass,
and that somewhere would have to be linked every place you use the
term, because it is a new term.<br>
<br>
Why not just call the sections of the documentation where
ASCII-supporting features of bytes are discussed "Special ASCII
support". Calling it that will make it clear that if you are not
using ASCII, you need to be careful of using the feature... or
contrariwise, that if you are using the feature, you need to be
using ASCII.<br>
<br>
While some ASCII supersets may also be usable with the features, I
don't think that should be emphasized in anyway, unless there is
specific support for particular ASCII supersets. Using ASCII
supersets should be "buyer beware".<br>
<br>
The whole b"%s" interpolation feature would, appropriately, be
described in such a section.<br>
</body>
</html>