<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/20/2014 11:05 PM, Nick Coghlan
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADiSq7cCM-YNZFO_1Vkss+Ja6zmPB-CvT34hOFg1eWKSwipW6g@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 21 September 2014 03:05, Alex Gaynor <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:alex.gaynor@gmail.com"><alex.gaynor@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">That sounds reasonable to me -- at this point I don't expect this to make it
into 3.4.2; Nick has some working code on the ticket:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://bugs.python.org/issue22417">http://bugs.python.org/issue22417</a> it's mostly missing documentation.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
I also think it's more sensible to target 2.7.9 & 3.4.3 for this
change, especially given the remaining rough edges in custom trust
database configuration on WIndows and Mac OS X that Christian pointed
out in <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://bugs.python.org/issue22449">http://bugs.python.org/issue22449</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
FWIW, I tagged 3.4.2rc1 about 24 hours ago, so it certainly didn't
make it into that. I could live with it going into 3.4.2 final if
the community was convinced that was the right thing to do. But I'm
more than happy about the conservative turn the plans have taken.<br>
<br>
If this isn't going in until 3.4.3, does that mean we need 3.4.3 on
any sort of particular schedule?<br>
<br>
<br>
<i>/arry</i><br>
</body>
</html>