<div dir="ltr">Shouldn't at least ayncio doc <a href="https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/asyncio.html">https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/asyncio.html</a> be updated accordingly ? for example <a href="https://docs.python.org/3.5/search.html?q=await&check_keywords=yes&area=default">https://docs.python.org/3.5/search.html?q=await&check_keywords=yes&area=default</a> doesn't mention <a href="https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/asyncio.html">https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/asyncio.html</a> <br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-08-02 16:21 GMT+02:00 Yury Selivanov <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:yselivanov.ml@gmail.com" target="_blank">yselivanov.ml@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Nikolaus,<br>
<br>
Strange.  PEP 492 changes are fully documented since b3.<br>
<br>
Here are just few examples:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://docs.python.org/3.5/whatsnew/3.5.html#pep-492-coroutines-with-async-and-await-syntax" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.python.org/3.5/whatsnew/3.5.html#pep-492-coroutines-with-async-and-await-syntax</a><br>
<a href="https://docs.python.org/3.5/reference/datamodel.html#coroutines" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.python.org/3.5/reference/datamodel.html#coroutines</a><br>
<a href="https://docs.python.org/3.5/reference/compound_stmts.html#coroutines" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.python.org/3.5/reference/compound_stmts.html#coroutines</a><br>
<br>
Perhaps, it's a browser cache issue?<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Yury</font></span><span class="im HOEnZb"><br>
<br>
On 2015-08-02 12:38 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hello,<br>
<br>
Looking at the language reference for 3.5.0b4, I noticed that it<br>
mentions neither async nor await.<br>
<br>
Is this still going to get updated, or will the only documentation<br>
consist of the PEP itself? I think having a Python release recognize<br>
keywords that are not mentioned in the language reference would be quite<br>
unfortunate (even if they're treated specially to preserve backwards<br>
compatibility).<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
-Nikolaus<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
_______________________________________________<br>
Python-Dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Python-Dev@python.org" target="_blank">Python-Dev@python.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/xavier.combelle%40gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/xavier.combelle%40gmail.com</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>