[Python-ideas] Concurrent safety?

[Antoine Pitrou]

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:03:14 -0700
Mike Meyer <mwm at mired.org> wrote:
> 
> Doesn't that cover all kinds of good programming? But advanced
> language features are there because they are supposed to help with
> either abstraction or separation of concerns. Look at the list I
> presented again:
> 
> - High level languages.
> - Byte-compiled languages.
> - Structured programming.
> - Automatic memory management.
> - Dynamic typing.
> - Object Oriented languages.
> 
> All help with either abstraction or separation of concerns in some way
> (ok, byte-compilation the concerns are external, in that it's code
> portability). So do the features I'd like tosee.

I don't think the latter is true. Manually listing objects that are
allowed to be mutated seems actually quite low-level to me.

Regards

Antoine.