[Python-ideas] static vs atdef, etc
zuo at chopin.edu.pl
Thu Sep 22 23:27:15 CEST 2011
Jim Jewett dixit (2011-09-22, 12:06):
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
> > * I'm sorry but the keyword atdef is ugly. The only proposal I like is
> > static, but I agree that it only makes sense to someone with a C-type
> > background.
> Even with a C background, static is a bad choice, because it has
> already been used for too many different meanings. (Admittedly, not
> all in C.)
Yeas, we have already staticmethod -- something *completely* different.
-1 for `static` name.
+1 for `atdef`, IMHO it is not ungly :).
More information about the Python-ideas