[Python-ideas] all, any - why no none ?
Ben Finney
ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Wed Apr 11 00:34:46 CEST 2012
Steven Samuel Cole
<steven.samuel.cole at gmail.com> writes:
> i'm aware they've been around for quite a while, but for some reason,
> i did not have the builtins all(seq) and any(seq) on the radar thus
> far. when i used them today, i just assumed there was a corresponding
> none(seq), but was surprised to learn that is not true.
And then you realised ‘not any(seq)’ works fine, and continued on
satisfied. Right?
--
\ “Not to be absolutely certain is, I think, one of the essential |
`\ things in rationality.” —Bertrand Russell |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list