<div dir="ltr">On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stephen@xemacs.org" target="_blank">stephen@xemacs.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><br></div>
If he had a specific proposal to adopt an existing workflow tool that<br>
could be just plugged in, that would be on-topic (for lack of an open-<br>
subscription python-cabal list).[1]<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div>Oh no - the day is lost. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabal">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabal</a> - it's a whole new English wor(l)d.</div>
<div><br></div><div><div>AOT: I'd open a Python-Cabal room in my city to work out on secret plans like online</div><div>editor for <a href="http://docs.python.org">docs.python.org</a>.</div></div><div><br></div></div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Footnotes:<br>
[1] open-cabal is an oxymoron, of course. And TINC. Of course. ;-)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div>TINCerers are lurking in the depths of strictly secret pydotorg list. =)<br></div></div><div style><br></div>
</div></div></div>