<p dir="ltr"><br>
On 31 May 2013 14:28, "Haoyi Li" <<a href="mailto:haoyi.sg@gmail.com">haoyi.sg@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Anyone else have any thoughts about this? This seems like it would be a pretty straightforward thing to do, and I would be happy to go through the code and submit a patch. The only question is whether we want to do it in the first place; are there any reasons it can't/shouldn't be done that I'm not aware of?</p>
<p dir="ltr">Seems reasonable to me, but would need to see a patch to give a definite yes or no. </p>
<p dir="ltr">Cheers,<br>
Nick.</p>
<p dir="ltr">><br>
><br>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Steven D'Aprano <<a href="mailto:steve@pearwood.info">steve@pearwood.info</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> On 30/05/13 10:04, Haoyi Li wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> I don't need to keep the source code, I just need a single integer for each<br>
>>> node. I would then be able to reconstruct the source snippet.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> And so you did say. Sorry for the noise.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> -- <br>
>> Steven<br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Python-ideas mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Python-ideas@python.org">Python-ideas@python.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas">http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Python-ideas mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Python-ideas@python.org">Python-ideas@python.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas">http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas</a><br>
><br>
</p>