<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Dennis Brakhane <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brakhane@googlemail.com" target="_blank">brakhane@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":11x" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">What's the point in trying to turn Python into a statically typed<br>


language that can optionally be dynamically typed? There are enough good<br>
static languages out there.</div></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">That's important.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Even within the standard lib, Python is a well behaved systems citizen, so people are free to write parts of their software in any language/environment, and Python will happily communicate with whatever.<br>

<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Cheers,<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Juancarlo </span><b style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Añez</b>
</div></div>