<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Neil Girdhar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mistersheik@gmail.com" target="_blank">mistersheik@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">If you decide to make a PEP, please list the other algorithms you found and their definitions. </div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>sure -- care to contribute ;-)</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"> Personally, I'm for being consistent with numpy and defining math.isclose similar to numpy.isclose for consistency alone.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is a good question for the larger, non-numpy group. I'm personally a heavy numpy user, and don't see any reason to be consistent -- and I (and others on this list) have some real issues with the numpy approach. But we shouldn't call it isclose() if it's not the same algorithm...</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>-- <br><div><br>Christopher Barker, Ph.D.<br>Oceanographer<br><br>Emergency Response Division<br>NOAA/NOS/OR&R <a href="tel:%28206%29%20526-6959" value="+12065266959" target="_blank">(206) 526-6959</a> voice<br>7600 Sand Point Way NE <a href="tel:%28206%29%20526-6329" value="+12065266329" target="_blank">(206) 526-6329</a> fax<br>Seattle, WA 98115 <a href="tel:%28206%29%20526-6317" value="+12065266317" target="_blank">(206) 526-6317</a> main reception<br><br><a href="mailto:Chris.Barker@noaa.gov" target="_blank">Chris.Barker@noaa.gov</a></div>
</div></div>