<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 20.08.2015 02:18, Steven D'Aprano wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:20150820001827.GN5249@ando.pearwood.info"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:01:12AM +0200, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Point is, the tools should make it stupidly easy to get things done.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
"The problem with this is that we will have done what humans often do,
which is to use technology to make things easier while missing an
opportunity to make them significantly better."
-- Rory Sutherland and Glen Weyl
If Python becomes everything that you want from your proposal, how will
it be *better* rather than just easier?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
"I am uncertain why you are so averse about making threading easier
to handle and to maintain. If you bother about 'easier', let's call
it 'code works more reliably', 'code is more readable', 'code has
lesser side-effects', 'code produces lesser races'."<br>
-- Sven R. Kunze<br>
<br>
<br>
This quoted: what is your definition of <b>better</b>?<br>
<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Sven<br>
<br>
<br>
PS: there is no such thing as **better* (at least from my
perspective). It all comes down to a personal definition. Watching
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://vimeo.com/79539317">https://vimeo.com/79539317</a> , I can tell that there much more
potential for improvements under the hoods. However, the public API
for the "end developers" should be made and stay as simple as
possible. Just for the sake of "getting things done".<br>
</body>
</html>