<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Sep 14, 2015, at 06:51, Donald Stufft <<a href="mailto:donald@stufft.io" class="">donald@stufft.io</a>> wrote:</div><div class=""><br class="">I don't love the "seedable" and "seedless" names here, but I don't have a<br class="">better suggestion for the userspace CSPRNG one because it's security properties<br class="">are a bit nuanced. People doing security sensitive things like generating keys<br class="">for cryptography should still use something based on os.urandom, so it's mostly<br class="">about providing a safety net that will "probably" [1] be safe.</div></blockquote><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""> Probably<br class="">something like random.ProbablySecureRandom is a bad name :)<br class=""></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>Yes but unsecureRandom for the unsecure one (which obviously is insecure)</div><div>is not unreasonable. (unsafe can be shorter) </div><div><br class=""></div><div>-- </div><div>M</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Also seedless does not mean secure: <a href="https://xkcd.com/221/" class="">https://xkcd.com/221/</a> :-) <br class=""><div><br class=""></div></div><br class=""></body></html>