[Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
Fredrik Lundh
effbot at telia.com
Thu Oct 26 17:03:32 CEST 2000
- Previous message: [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Next message: [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Pete wrote:
> What has not been mentioned is that the "2" and "3" are integers. If
> you want them to be floats they should be spelt "2." and "3." in the
> same way that longs would be spelt "2L" and "3L".
why?
</F>
- Previous message: [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Next message: [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Python-list
mailing list