PEP 2, Procedure for Adding New Modules
m.faassen at vet.uu.nl
Thu Mar 14 12:52:47 CET 2002
Aahz Maruch <aahz at panix.com> wrote:
> In article <a6i4o7$jd0$1 at newshost.accu.uu.nl>,
> Martijn Faassen <m.faassen at vet.uu.nl> wrote:
>>Aahz Maruch <aahz at panix.com> wrote:
>>> The maintainers also possess primary responsibility for determining
>>> whether bugfixes should be backported to previous Python releases as
>>> discussed in PEP 6.
>>Thanks; I'm adding some phrases on this to PEP 2. PEP 6 claims it's a
>>'draft' PEP by the way, what is its status?
> Looking at the status of other PEPs, it should be "Active", I think. I'm
> cc'ing Barry on this to get his opinion.
Mine's in there now though, which is set to 'draft'; I mean, it shouldn't
become active just because it's in the list. But I assume it was discussed
and approved. Which is good as my PEP refers to yours. Now I only need
to go advocate for it on python-dev. :)
History of the 20th Century: WW1, WW2, WW3?
No, WWW -- Could we be going in the right direction?
More information about the Python-list