PEP 276 (was Re: Status of PEP's?)
eppstein at ics.uci.edu
Sat Mar 2 07:52:20 CET 2002
In article <a5psh2$ga8$1 at bob.news.rcn.net>,
"Raymond Hettinger" <python at rcn.com> wrote:
> There is a pair of ideas that are intuitive, clean, and routinely useful:
> for i in indici(seqn)
> for i, item in indexed(seqn)
Isn't this in PEP 212?
Maybe it should be undeferred?
David Eppstein UC Irvine Dept. of Information & Computer Science
eppstein at ics.uci.edu http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/
More information about the Python-list