ternary operator vote
tismer at tismer.com
Sun Feb 9 15:51:30 CET 2003
James J. Besemer wrote:
> I would humbly suggest that somebody other than Aahz control the voting.
> I don't know Aahz. I have no reason to doubt his integrity or expect
> him to cheat. Nevertheless, he has indicated considerable hostility
> towards the propsoal and this strikes me as inconsistent with the role.
If you don't believe he cheats, why shouldn't
he do it, then? I see no difference between
an opponent and a proponent performing this
task without cheating.
> Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't it TRADITIONAL for a PROPONENT of a
> PEP lead the discussion, revise the PEP accordingly and call for a
> vote? There are several members qualified to lead this effort. Andrew
> Koenig stands out as one; at least his diligence to date indicates he
> may have the time for it.
I'm also sure that you don't want us to think
that you'd prefer a cheating proponent, but
your shouting might smell like this.
I-know-Aahz-better-than-you* - ly y'rs - chris
* both possible meanings hold
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 pager +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
More information about the Python-list