comprehensions was Re: Switch statements again
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Mon Jan 20 03:24:23 CET 2003
Tim Peters wrote:
> I hope to God nobody is doing that in real life, but then I never
> expected anyone to do
> (f() and [g()] or [h()])
> in real life either <0.5 wink>.
Well, I hope that in "real life" people aren't really doing this
commonly. The point of wanting a conditional operator (which I would
gladly welcome in Python, by the way) is readability; this utterly
destroys that. `p and x or y' (when x is known not to be false) is
barely tolerable, but even that is seriously pushing it.
People don't really commonly use the (p and [x] or [y]) trick, do
Erik Max Francis / max at alcyone.com / http://www.alcyone.com/max/
__ San Jose, CA, USA / 37 20 N 121 53 W / &tSftDotIotE
/ \ Yes I'm / Learning from falling down / Heavily
Fauxident / http://www.alcyone.com/pyos/fauxident/
A "faux" ident daemon in Python.
More information about the Python-list