CamelCase versus wide_names (Prothon)
apardon at forel.vub.ac.be
Fri Apr 23 10:46:09 CEST 2004
Op 2004-04-22, Mark Hahn schreef <mark at prothon.org>:
> "Roy Smith" <roy at panix.com> wrote ...
>> Well, we could always try something like...
> That's it! We'll do the whole Prothon language in XML! (The one idea that
> hasn't been proposed over in Prothon lists yet :)
How about this idea, which is about something different but may be
related. Allow your argument list to be divided among the identifier.
If you would define a component as something like an identifier but
without an underscore and then define an identifier as a number
of components attached to each other with underscores you then could
allow a function to have part of its arguments between components.
could then also be written as:
More information about the Python-list