best book: aint no such thing, and encouragement for old coots
michele.simionato at poste.it
Tue Jan 20 08:55:11 CET 2004
cartermark46 at ukmail.com (Mark Carter) wrote in message news:<d3c9c04.0401190851.5a2f006b at posting.google.com>...
> I suppose that Schemers and Lispers take the attitude that a lack of
> syntax is an advantage, because you can ultimately program in any
> paradigm you wish. It's "just" a case of writing code that implements
> the paradigm.
Uh? The lack of syntax has nothing to do with the lack of paradigm,
I miss you point, sorry.
> I have also heard claims that the existence of
> parantheses in s-exprs is a red herring as far as readability is
That's true, the parentheses are a not a problem for readability, they
are a problem for *writability*: in practice, they force you to use emacs
or The Other Editor. Somebody can argue that this is a Good Thing,
anyway ;) So, it is somewhat true that Lisp/Scheme are difficult to
read, but this is due to the choice of names and to the unusual order
of evaluation more than to the parentheses. Just my 2 eurocents,
More information about the Python-list