Bug or feature?
exarkun at intarweb.us
Fri Jan 16 16:36:06 CET 2004
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 08:31:32AM +0000, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> Terry Reedy fed this fish to the penguins on Thursday 15 January 2004
> 15:39 pm:
> > and returning a value. I see a little better Guido's reason for having
> > list modification methods return None. While chaining is not too
> > problematical, object returns would allow list expressions mixing
> > implicit and overt effects with possible puzzles similar to the one
> > presented in this thread.
> Now that you mention it... Yeah... Can you imagine trying to figure
> out what something like
> alist = ['j', 'i', 'h', 'g', 'f', 'e', 'd', 'c', 'b', 'a']
> res = alist[:5] + alist.sort() + alist[5:]
> was supposed to return?
> The only "known" is that the middle is supposed to be abcdefghij, but
> the left and right ends depend solely on order of evaluation...
Doesn't seem to be a problem, after all.
More information about the Python-list