parameters to logging.debug()
m.h.3.9.1.without.dots.at.cam.ac.uk at example.com
Tue Oct 26 18:32:41 CEST 2004
Winston WOLFF wrote:
> What do people think about changing the parameters to logging.debug() to
> be more like the parameters to print?
I think it will break a lot of software that uses the current API.
> Also, for those who like the second format better, you can always type:
> log.debug( "index=%i dict=%s x=%d y=%d z=%d" % ( i, dict, x, y, z) )
That argument could also be made about your proposal. You can always type:
log.debug(" ".join(map(str, ("index=",i, "dict=", dict, "x=", x, "y=",
y, "z=", z))))
(Isn't Python going to start auto-stringizing the items in a join
Or better yet, you can subclass your own logger that does this
automatically. That's one of the reasons the logging stuff is so
More information about the Python-list