Debunking Art - fraudster with python AI engine?
jeff at ccvcorp.com
Wed Sep 1 21:44:58 CEST 2004
>"Chris S." <chrisks at NOSPAM.udel.edu> wrote in message news:<4133ff91$1 at news.unimelb.edu.au>...
>>So what's the problem? You make it sound like he *must* be plagerizing
>>someone else's work, but PyAIML is for creating just such an interface.
>>There are even free brains available. Considering the term "AI engine"
>>has no official meaning, a shell powered by an AIML interpreter could
>>easily be one of many possible solutions to such a setup.
>Well, if I were using a cryptographic library, I wouldn't dare claim I
>were a cryptographer. I may say that I had written an application that
>uses a third party cryptographic component... I think in this context
>he is using the fact that the chances of a technical person
>questioning his work are extremely slim.
It's also possible that he simply misunderstood what you meant by
"engine", and was meaning to say that he wrote the program (using
available libraries). The breakdown of a program into functional
components is not as obvious as many of us tend to think, and the naming
of those components is even less obvious. I can easily see a
nontechnical hobbyist-programmer, who's taken an off-the-shelf NLP
library and customized its responses to particular words/phrases, not
seeing this as being an entirely different thing than writing an AI
engine (when he has perhaps never heard the term "AI engine" before).
The important thing, here, at least to my mind, is whether or not this
installation was interesting as a piece of art. If it was interesting,
then I could care less whether the artist (metaphorically) made his own
paints or got them at the local hobby store -- even if he *is*
stretching the truth about which he'd done.
[ comp.ai is moderated. To submit, just post and be patient, or if ]
[ that fails mail your article to <comp-ai at moderators.isc.org>, and ]
[ ask your news administrator to fix the problems with your system. ]
More information about the Python-list