What's the cost of using hundreds of threads?
claird at lairds.us
Wed Mar 2 18:08:04 CET 2005
In article <d047rn$dtf$1 at julia.coi.pw.edu.pl>,
Przemys³aw Ró¿ycki <P.Rozycki at elka.pw.edu.pl> wrote:
>Thanks for your comments on winXP threads implementation. You confirmed
>me in conviction that I shouldn't use windows.
>Personally I use linux with 2.6.10 kernel, so hopefully I don't have to
>share your grief. ;)
? !? I'm confused, and apparently I'm confusing others.
The one message I posted in this thread--largely reinforced
by others--emphasizes only that WinXP is far *better* than
earlier Win* flavors in its thread management. While I not
only agree that Windows has disadvantages, but have stopped
buying it for our company, my reasons have absolutely nothing
to do with the details of implementation of WinXP.
More information about the Python-list