No subject

to compare with Python's, especially since Ruby uses garbage collection,
which is something Python's looking at using in the future, in some
way.

> Python is good enough to satisfy many, but some (including me, the
> designer of the Ruby language) perfer Ruby.  TMTOWTDI.

Agreed. This isn't a flamewar anyway. Ian Clarke chose a far more civilized
title to his post than he did a while back in comp.lang.perl. ;)

What-does-TMTOWTDI-stand-for?-ly yours,

Martijn
-- 
History of the 20th Century: WW1, WW2, WW3?
No, WWW -- Could we be going in the right direction?