Boolean tests [was Re: Attack a sacred Python Cow]
Erik Max Francis
max at alcyone.com
Wed Jul 30 06:22:34 CEST 2008
Carl Banks wrote:
> That's not what I was asking for. I was asking for a use case for "if
> x" that can't be replaced by a simple explicit test. Your example
> didn't satisfy that.
It's a completely artificial request. "if x" _is_ a completely simple
test. Simpler, in fact, than the ones you were advocating.
Erik Max Francis && max at alcyone.com && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis
An ounce of hypocrisy is worth a pound of ambition.
-- Michael Korda
More information about the Python-list