2.6, 3.0, and truly independent intepreters
jnoller at gmail.com
Fri Oct 24 21:48:57 CEST 2008
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Andy O'Meara <andy55 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm a lousy writer sometimes, but I feel bad if you took the time to
> describe threads vs processes. The only reason I raised IPC with my
> "messaging isn't very attractive" comment was to respond to Glenn
> Linderman's points regarding tradeoffs of shared memory vs no.
I actually took the time to bring anyone listening in up to speed, and
to clarify so I could better understand your use case. Don't feel bad,
things in the thread are moving fast and I just wanted to clear it up.
Ideally, we all want to improve the language, and the interpreter.
However trying to push it towards a particular use case is dangerous
given the idea of "general use".
More information about the Python-list