Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?
Russ.Paielli at gmail.com
Wed Jan 21 06:26:33 CET 2009
On Jan 20, 9:07 pm, James Mills <prolo... at shortcircuit.net.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Russ P. <Russ.Paie... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> My mistake for using "trivial" instead, I didn't realise it would trip
> >> up your pedantry.
> > Your mistake for being a moron. But it seems to happen regularly,
> > doesn't it. How much more of my time are you going to waste, loser?
> I'm sorry Russ, but you insult my friend you die.
> You are -in fact- the moron here. I only wish my good friend
> and software engineering professor were here to laugh
> at this stupidly funny thread.
> Please stop replying.
I die? That sounds like a threat. I should report you for that, loser.
Are you going to stalk me now, loser?
Oh, and does your software engineering professor agree with you that
Python is perfectly suitable for any safety-critical system, no matter
how large? That would be interesting to know.
More information about the Python-list