<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
David Abrahams wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:am2g4a$o6h$1@bob.news.rcn.net">
<pre wrap="">"Christian Tismer" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tismer@tismer.com"><tismer@tismer.com></a> wrote in message<br><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:mailman.1032107006.6411.python-list@python.org">news:mailman.1032107006.6411.python-list@python.org</a>...<br><br></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The changes to Python are also so small now, that<br>it doesn't matter if it will be merged or not.<br>Porting Stackless to a new Python is a matter of a few<br>hours. You may rely on getting a Stackless version<br>of any new Python version in almost no time.<br></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!----><br>I think it still matters. You don't want people who need stackless'<br>capabilities to have to use a non-standard Python forever, do you?<br></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
I am a little confused by this. I use threads, but threads must be compiled
in.<br>
This has been that the same since I downloaded my first python in '93 (Very<br>
good language Guido :-)<br>
<br>
<br>
Could someone please explain to a "confused" python user. Why the current
version of<br>
stackless python would not be distributed like threads???<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks to all for a great language!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br>
<br>
Mike<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:am2g4a$o6h$1@bob.news.rcn.net">
<pre wrap=""><br>--<br>-----------------------------------------------------------<br> David Abrahams * Boost Consulting<br><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:dave@boost-consulting.com">dave@boost-consulting.com</a> * <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.boost-consulting.com">http://www.boost-consulting.com</a><br><br><br><br></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>