<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
Thanks Martin,<br>
<br>
That is a good news. So there is no current technical reason,<br>
just a resource issue (not this this is not an issue).<br>
<br>
We are comming into beta at work, so I am pretty booked now.<br>
<br>
In a couple of weeks, I will send email Christian, and see if I can help<br>
this in any way.<br>
<br>
I did see that Christian had a paypal link setup. This is a great idea for<br>
open source code. If you are too booked to constribute, you can send<br>
a little bit of money ( or alot of money).<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks Martin,<br>
Mike<br>
<br>
Martin v. Löwis wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:j4znuio0kr.fsf@informatik.hu-berlin.de">
<pre wrap="">Michael Schneider <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:michaels@one.net"><michaels@one.net></a> writes:<br><br></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Could someone please explain to a "confused" python user. Why the<br>current version of stackless python would not be distributed like<br>threads???<br></pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!----><br>Very easy: because nobody makes it so. That, in turn, is because<br>nobody works on making it so. <br><br>Christian (rightfully) points out that this is not his obligation:<br>this is free software, he is not obliged to do anything - unless you<br>pay him to do something. Nobody else is obliged to incorporate<br>Stackless into Standard Python either. If you want this to happen,<br>contribute.<br><br>Regards,<br>Martin<br></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>