<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
I personally would take only one bite at a time. Meaning only do one then do the other later. <div><br></div><div>But to each it own :)<br><br>> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:48:11 -0500<br>> To: python-list@python.org<br>> From: jbiquez@icsmx.com<br>> Subject: Re: Python 2.7 or 3.1<br>> <br>> Hello all<br>> <br>> Would you consider a "not so intelligent move" for a newsbie to <br>> Python to have maybe version 2.7 and 3.x (if that's possible to be <br>> running together on the same machine) to have them run and be <br>> learning mainly in 2.7 and see differences in 3.x? In my case I am <br>> interested mainly in web applications with a database and if possible <br>> being accesing dbase since a projects still runs a big system under <br>> dbase format, or definitely stay with 2.7 for a while until most in <br>> migrate it t o 3.x?<br>> <br>> Thanks in advance<br>> Jorge Biquez<br>> <br>> At 05:21 p.m. 29/10/2010, geremy condra wrote:<br>> >On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Braden Faulkner <bradenf@hotmail.com> wrote:<br>> > > Would it be safe to say that 2.6 would be even better for beginners than?<br>> ><br>> >Let me just come out with a contrary point of view before you go down<br>> >that path. If you're seriously considering using sqlite, then you may<br>> >be just as well off using Python3 as 2.7 or 2.6- it's in all of the<br>> >above, and Python3 is a big cleanup over previous versions of the<br>> >language.<br>> ><br>> >Geremy Condra<br>> >--<br>> >http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list<br>> <br>> <br>> -- <br>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list<br></div> </body>
</html>