<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 19/04/2011 9:05 AM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:python-list-request@python.org">python-list-request@python.org</a> wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:mailman.2422.1303167902.9058.python-list@python.org"
type="cite">
<table class="header-part1" width="100%" border="0"
cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
</tbody>
</table>
Am 18.04.2011 09:59, schrieb Werner F. Bruhin:<br>
<div class="moz-text-plain" wrap="true" graphical-quote="true"
style="font-family: -moz-fixed; font-size: 13px;"
lang="x-western">
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: rgb(102, 102, 204);">
<pre wrap=""><span class="moz-txt-citetags">> </span>On 04/17/2011 11:57 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: rgb(102, 102, 204);">
<pre wrap=""><span class="moz-txt-citetags"></span><span class="moz-txt-citetags">>> </span> <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.python.org/2.5.6">http://www.python.org/2.5.6</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
If there is an official release of source (e.g. 2.5.5 and 2.5.6) why
aren't binaries produced (other than to make it really hard for
users and force them to upgrade to a later major revision -- 2.6,
2.7, etc) ??<br>
<br>
It's ok for Linux distros as they tend to build from sources, and
test, and produce their own binary packages. But for OS X and MSW
users it's not quite like that. I'd like to upgrade to 2.5.6 (for
one particular mature application), but unfortunately I'm stuck with
2.5.4 as I don't really want to have to build (and hopefully get it
right) on my OS X box.<br>
<br>
Cheers, Brendan.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>