[Pythonmac-SIG] PIL for OS-X
Ronald Oussoren
ronaldoussoren at mac.com
Tue Apr 8 12:55:37 CEST 2008
On 5 Apr, 2008, at 1:40, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There's been a discussion over on the Image-sig about what the PIL web
> site should tell folks that want PIL for OS-X. There have simply been
> too many "I'm having trouble building PIL on OS-X" questions.
>
> I've suggested that the PIL website include binaries for the "best"
> versions of Python to support. Fredrik can't build them, but hopefully
> someone on this list can do it for him when a new PIL version comes
> out
> -- the 1.1.6 binary on pythonmac.org/packages is a good start.
>
> However, it's not so simple, 'cause of all the Python's out there.
> So my
> question is:
>
> Can we build a single binary installer for PIL that will work with
> BOTH
> Apple's Python2.5 that comes with OS-X 10.5 and MacPython2.5,
> Universal
> Framework Build for OS-X 10.3.9 and above.
Not really, you'll have to provide two installers.
BTW. What I'd like to see is a collection of recipes for building
packages like
this. That is, a Makefile/shell-script/python-script/... that will
build all dependencies,
the package itself and an installer.
That's the most annoying issue with the pythonmac.org repository: some
packages are non-trivial to rebuild (such as PyOpenGL 2.x) and there
is no
indication whatsover of how they were build.
That's not very interesting for users, until it is time to build a
binary for the next
version and someone has to reinvent the proper build proces.
Ronald
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2224 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythonmac-sig/attachments/20080408/1fbc5923/attachment.bin
More information about the Pythonmac-SIG
mailing list