<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; "><BR><DIV><DIV>On Apr 21, 2006, at 5:04 AM, Brendan Simons wrote:</DIV><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><DIV>I'm wary of using the brick logo, because as far as I can see Apple uses them extensively for OS components. I don't want to dilute their visual meaning by co-opting the icon for something different. I agree that the box isn't great either though since eggs aren't executable.</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>eggs are like components. They are plugins that you drop into Python to give Python more capabilities.</DIV><BR><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><DIV><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><FONT face="Helvetica" size="3" color="#000000" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; color: #000000"><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><FONT face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">Probably the python logo is enough, since the file ends in .py.</FONT></DIV></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><DIV>OK, here I have to disagree again. I use icon view all the time, and I really appreciate having filetypes written on file icons. It's one of the reasons I switched to the mac. It lets me know what type of is what without having to decode some unfamiliar icon, or look to the file extension (which is still optional on the mac, though I admit, required for python). I'll look into the font, but I thought it was supposed to be Lucida Grande. </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></DIV><DIV>I'm fine with having py on the icon. I don't care because I'll never be seeing that particular icon, because my py files will be associated with another editor.</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>dp</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV></BODY></HTML>