[sapug] Plethora of jobs on SEEK for Python programmers in Adelaide.
Chris Foote
chris at inetd.com.au
Fri Mar 7 02:46:50 CET 2008
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Daryl Tester wrote:
> Well, by plethora I mean 5. And 3 of them seem to be the same job.
Yep, that's a huge amount, not :-)
I thought it might be interesting to see the proportions for different
languages in different cities for Seek IT Job listings:
|-------------+----------+-------+-----------+--------|
| Search Term | Adelaide | Perth | Melbourne | Sydney |
|-------------+----------+-------+-----------+--------|
| Ruby | 2 | 1 | 27 | 58 |
| Perl | 4 | 19 | 157 | 312 |
| Python | 5 | 5 | 50 | 86 |
| COBOL | 5 | 4 | 22 | 42 |
| PHP | 9 | 26 | 174 | 312 |
| Javascript | 18 | 46 | 287 | 734 |
| ASP | 20 | 30 | 172 | 336 |
| VB | 29 | 23 | 100 | 332 |
| C | 33 | 107 | 234 | 525 |
| C++ | 39 | 122 | 228 | 596 |
| C# | 53 | 177 | 369 | 1189 |
| .NET | 54 | 220 | 609 | 1538 |
| Java | 62 | 125 | 631 | 1517 |
|-------------+----------+-------+-----------+--------|
The dynamic languages don't fare well for job listings.
Here's a stack of guesses to explore as to why this might be the case:
- Existing programmers within organisations are so productive in moving
to dynamic languages that they haven't needed to employ extra
programmers even with growth.
- Job satisfaction for existing programmers using dynamic languages
is higher than when using traditional languages, so there's no need
for filling replacement positions.
- Dynamic languages aren't popular.
- The popular dynamic languages have an interpreter implementation that
doesn't lend itself to hiding proprietary code from prying eyes.
- It takes 10 to 20 times more people to produce software when
not using dynamic languages.
I wonder if someone has done a real study on dynamic language
use for employment.
Chris Foote <chris at inetd.com.au>
Inetd Pty Ltd T/A HostExpress
Web: http://www.hostexpress.com.au
Blog: http://www.hostexpress.com.au/drupal/chris
Phone: (08) 8410 4566
More information about the sapug
mailing list