Greyscale reconstruction and merging CellProfiler code

Tony Yu tsyu80 at gmail.com
Sun Aug 7 17:55:38 EDT 2011


2011/8/7 Stéfan van der Walt <stefan at sun.ac.za>

> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Tony Yu <tsyu80 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > That's strange: I can't see any missing files. I don't get any missing
> image warnings from Sphinx, and I don't have any uncommitted files on my
> end.
>
> If I look at your Git repo, I don't see noisy_circles.png, for example.
>
> https://github.com/tonysyu/scikits.image/tree/master/scikits/image/data
>

Oh, the grey_reconstruction stuff is in a separate branch:
https://github.com/tonysyu/scikits.image/tree/reconstruction/scikits/image/data
which does have a file named noisy_circles.jpg.

It seems like the grey, white and boolean morphology operators share
> (or could share) quite a lot of code, and functionally belong
> together.  The main problem with a proliferation of namespaces is
> helping the user to detangle the package.
>
> How about we just make the grey-level operators default, i.e.
> white_tophat etc., and if we then add boolean operators name them
> differently?
>

That sounds good to me.

Cheers,
-Tony
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/attachments/20110807/ba6493dc/attachment.html>


More information about the scikit-image mailing list