[SciPy-User] peer review of scientific software

[zetah]

Thomas Kluyver wrote:
>> Oops... did I jump in semi-private discussion?
>
>No, sorry if I gave that impression. This is all intended to be public, as 
>far as I'm aware.

All right, thanks.
You were mentioning a group of users, and encouraging some routes, so I thought your initial discussion was concerning some group known to you.
Never mind, I don't plan to advocate Excel in Python user group, but to raise concern about terminology used. "Excel > spreadsheet"

Cheers