[spambayes-dev] RE: Why did python.org give this a 550 ("looks like spam")?

[Skip Montanaro]

    Tony> I don't think the training regime needs to be improved - it seems
    Tony> reasonable that the message was bounced for that reason (although
    Tony> strange that Skip's one wasn't).  I had forgotten that spambayes
    Tony> would be doing the filtering for the list, and was (ironically)
    Tony> thinking that there was a rule that was classifying the message as
    Tony> spam, which wouldn't have been so good.

Maybe the Reply-To: for spambayes-checkins should be spambayes-dev (and
similarly for python-checkins/python-dev).  Can that be engineered through
Mailman?

Skip