[Spambayes] Guidance re pickles versus DB for Outlook
Tue Nov 26 18:28:09 2002
>>>>> "TAP" == T Alexander Popiel <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
TAP> In message: <email@example.com>
TAP> Jeremy Hylton <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> I just did a cvs update in spambayes and tried to restart my
>> pspam code, but nothing is working anymore :-(. I'm sorry I
>> haven't had time to read every message on the proposed changes,
>> but there's been a flurry of activity and I've got a day job.
TAP> Yeah, there's been a bunch of changes, mostly revolving around
TAP> the removal of update_probabilities.
Except that it wasn't removed! It's just a big decoy waiting to lure
people reading the code away from the interface.
>> Anyway, here's a traceback. Can anyone suggest quickly how I
>> would fix this? The pspam code calls learn() for a bunch of
>> messages and then calls update_probabilities() at the end. Is
>> that the default now? Or is that a discontinued feature? Are
>> the APIs documented anywhere?
TAP> You need to remove the _last_ argument passed to learn(),
TAP> dealing with whether or not to run update_probabilities().
TAP> Judging by later mail, it sounds like you removed the
TAP> second-to-last argument (ham vs. spam), and are now calling
TAP> everything ham.
Except that I didn't. It's pretty easy to remove the last argument
TAP> You should also remove the call to update_probabilities(),
TAP> since it's toast, but it sounds like you already did that.
TAP> The API is unfortunately not documented yet; until someone goes
TAP> back through and updates it, the code itself will be the best
Except that the code has docstrings that are wrong.
TAP> Addressing a concern from a later mail, the MetaInfo class
TAP> exists to make it easier to derive subclasses of the classifier
TAP> and its parts, without having to touch everything.
This sounds like YAGNI to me.
More information about the Spambayes