[Spambayes] Request, extending the functionality for other kinds of classifications?

[fredrik.kant@sungard.com]

Hi!

First I need to say that I have used SpamBays for almost 2 years and it
worked real fine.

In a test in Sweden's larges computer magazines, Data Magazinet, SpamBay
was ranked number one compared to 11 other SpamBays filter, most of them
you had to pay for.

Not just because it is free but because it is so accurate. The only
negative thing was perhaps the performance.

 

My questions is: I wonder how hard it would be to be able to extend
SpamBays so it can be used for other kind of classifications? My idea is
that why not be able to classify mails as: important, medium,low
,private or so and use the same technology to train to filter for doing
different classifications. Then people which receives a lot of mail
could get a first classification and process the most important mails
first.

I assume one would like to have a similar folder as the "Junc Suspect"
folder (e.g. "not classified") or one common "suspect" folder.

 

Having friends in Management positions receiving on average 50-60 mails
per day that must be processed (but normally there is not enough time)
the above described functionality would probably help them in there mail
processing so it would be a nice thing to have.

 

 

Fredrik Kant  * Product Specialist * FRONT ARENA * SunGard
World Trade Center, Kungsbron 1, PO Box 70351, SE-107 24 Stockholm,
Sweden
Tel +46 8 454 0126 * Mobile +46 768 692 126 * fredrik.kant at sungard.com
<mailto:fredrik.kant at sungard.com>  * www.front.com
<BLOCKED::http://www.frontarena.com/>  

CONFIDENTIALITY: This email (including any attachments) may contain
confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized
disclosure or use is prohibited. If you received this email in error,
please notify the sender and delete this email from your system. Thank
you.

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/spambayes/attachments/20051115/709d6a94/attachment.htm