[Spambayes] Feature idea: Autobalancing ham/spam

[Amedee Van Gasse]

On Wed, November 28, 2007 14:11, skip at pobox.com wrote:
>
>     Amedee> I think it is easier to acknowledge that spam won't go away,
>     Amedee> that no solution is perfect, and that it is less work to
> retrain
>     Amedee> from scratch when your ham/spam ratio becomes ridiculous.
>
> Or simply whack off your oldest spam messages to keep things more-or-less
> balanced.

That would imply archiving your spam AND ham & retraining from scratch
every time?
I think most people just classify&delete spam.
With an average spam message size of 12730 bytes on my system, how many
megabytes of storage do you recommend?

-- 
Amedee Van Gasse
amedee at amedee.be