[stdlib-sig] Maintenance of optparse
armin.ronacher at active-4.com
Tue Sep 15 21:09:43 CEST 2009
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> This one doesn't. This is a kind of "you are either with me, or against
> me" argument. While I would favour improving optparse over including
> argparse, I don't think we can commit to never include argparse, just
> because you asked for it.
I can see strong disagreement with me here which is why I would love to
change my point to "I would only *continue* to maintain optparse is
argparse does not end up in the standard library". If both end up
there, maintenance from my side ends.
More information about the stdlib-sig