<span class="gmail_quote"></span><span class="q">On 07/10/2007, <b class="gmail_sendername">Ricardo Aráoz</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:ricaraoz@gmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">ricaraoz@gmail.com
</a>&gt; wrote:</span><div><span class="q"><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Alan Gauld wrote:<br>&gt; &quot;Dick Moores&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:rdm@rcblue.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">rdm@rcblue.com</a>&gt; wrote<br>&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; &lt;<a href="http://www.redcanary.ca/view/top-programming" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://www.redcanary.ca/view/top-programming
</a>&gt;<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Interesting, but I&#39;m not sure what the criteria for &quot;top&quot; is.<br>&gt; Is it a measure of power, popularity, usage?<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Scary that HTML/CSS should be so high though
<br>&gt; given its not a programming language at all!<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Alan G.<br>&gt;<br><br>Besides all that, we are programmers not fashion models. Who cares which<br>is the &quot;top&quot; language, leave that for the &quot;top models&quot; and such. Our
<br>trade is code, not fashion.</blockquote></span><div><br>It appears from the original survey page that it is the most popular by employer<br>demand so it probably does matter if you want a job in that sort of area<br>
<a href="http://www.redcanary.ca/view/top-10-programming" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://www.redcanary.ca/view/top-10-programming</a><br></div><br></div><br>