[Web-SIG] Pending modifications to PEP 333
ianb at colorstudy.com
Mon Aug 30 05:38:57 CEST 2004
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> Here are some changes I've proposed in the last few days to resolve
> issues people brought up, but which I haven't gotten much feedback on:
> * 'wsgi.fatal_errors' key for exceptions that apps and middleware
> shouldn't trap
> * what should a server or gateway's default error handling be, for each
> of the eight contexts in which an exception can occur?
Those are hard problems. Lots of thought. I haven't done much thought
on it, so I don't have any comments.
> * 'wsgi.auth_available' flag
> * Make the 'headers' object an 'email.Message' (well, there's been some
> feedback, but I think I addressed the concerns, and there was no
> feedback since)
I'm -0 on email.Message.
> * notes on writing pre-2.2 compatible iteration code
I'd rather allow lazier applications and put more of the pre-2.2
compatibility work in the hands of the server.
> * anything else?
Integer status code? And the Status header. I'm -0 on a status header.
I'm +1 on integer status code.
Ian Bicking / ianb at colorstudy.com / http://blog.ianbicking.org
More information about the Web-SIG