[Web-SIG] WSGI adoption

[David Warnock]

Peter,

> It's going slowly but surely, as I can tell from my Googling. I think
> we could speed adoption very quickly if we all got together and
> created stable, tested, proven, and officialy WSGI gateways.
> 
> I think the following list would be a good place to start, with the
> important ones first and the less-important ones near the bottom:
> 
> - CGI
> - FastCGI
> - mod_python
> - Microsoft ASP+Python
> - Twisted
> - Zope (2 or 3)

I would add quixotes SCGI, it seems to be good and stable.

> What do you guys think? If we go to all the framework writers and say
> "if you adopt WSGI your framework will automatically run on all of
> these platforms", don't you think it's a no-brainer to support it?

Absoloutely, I have been discussing this on the Quixote list and if wsgi 
seems to be a better way to support multiple servers then they will go 
for it.

Dave
-- 
David Warnock: Sundayta Ltd. http://www.sundayta.com