[Web-SIG] WSGI adoption
david at sundayta.com
Thu Nov 25 21:51:02 CET 2004
> I've got to say, I was disappointed when I read about the brand new
> Quixote 2.0 release, and saw that there was not a single mention of WSGI
> in the README or CHANGES files.
> I haven't looked at the Quixote 2.0 code at all. Perhaps there is code
> in there for WSGI, or someone has Quixote/WSGI code sitting on their
> hard-disk somewhere?
Nope. But I did get this on the mailing list from Neil Schemenaur
<nas at mems-exchange.org>:
> I wrote:
>>> [WSGI support] not my goal. One of my goals is to have Quixote
>>> work with as many HTTP servers as possible and to make it easy to
>>> switch between them.
> Upon that response is probably more cryptic than necessary. What I
> mean is that WSGI support itself means nothing to me. If supporting
> WSGI allows me to achieve my real goal then it will be supported.
David Warnock: Sundayta Ltd. http://www.sundayta.com
More information about the Web-SIG