[Web-SIG] Python 3.0 and WSGI 1.0.
alan at xhaus.com
Thu Apr 2 14:49:08 CEST 2009
> Would there be any interest in asking the HTTP-BIS working group  what
> they think about it?
> Currently I couldn't find anything in their drafts suggesting they had
> decided to clarify this issue from a protocol's perspective but they might
> consider it to be relevant to their goals.
> - Sylvain
>  http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/httpbis-charter.html
As mentioned in an earlier post, I think their current spec avoids the
issue, by still relying on "octet-by-octet" comparison.
But I did come across this discussion on their list, which goes into
all of the issues in fine detail.
Quote of the thread
> We are simply passing through the one and only defined i18n solution
> for HTTP/1.1 because it was the only solution available in 1994.
> If email clients can (and do) implement it, then so can WWW clients.
> People who want to fix that should start queueing for HTTP/1.2.
More information about the Web-SIG