[Web-SIG] PEP 0333 and PEP XXXX Updated
armin.ronacher at active-4.com
Sun Sep 20 14:36:12 CEST 2009
Armin Ronacher schrieb:
> WSGI 1.1 as currently specified in XXXX would be pretty uncontroversial
> on Python 2.x because of the str/unicode coercion that Python implicitly
> applies and that this is basically the only change.
Based on the table, XXXX is 2.0 now.
> That would be too many changes at the same time. We can specify WSGI
> 2.0 at the same time based on XXXX
Would be 3.0 then.
> IMO WSGI 1.0 should just fix the small problem it has, and WSGI 1.1 goes
> to unicode in both versions.
Based on the table. 1.0 is 1.1 and 1.1 is 2.0.
I hope that unconfuses my mail, but I'm pretty sure it did not :)
More information about the Web-SIG